The James River was in terrible shape 30 years ago, but cleanup efforts have largely restored its health. Today, rising numbers of people, and wild animals, are finding their way back to the 340-mile waterway - and attention is focused on how best to use and protect this hugely valuable resource.

by Caroline Kettlewell

7/12/10 12:14 PM

Do you like this?

A River Renaissance

John Henley

One suffocating summer Saturday in Richmond when I was in high school, in the 1970s, my friend suggested we go for a swim in the James River. We’d spent the preceding weeks in a windowless, air-conditioning-free downtown warehouse, building sets for a production at the city’s outdoor stage, Dogwood Dell. We’d probably lost our body weight in sweat and gained it again in the cheap, sugary, livid purple and green “bug juice” we bought and drank by the gallon. The thought of jumping into cool, fresh water was irresistible.

To get to the river required a long walk, considerable trespassing and, if I remember correctly, wading through a tick haven of tall grass. But finally we stood on the bank, just above Bosher Dam, west of the city. We plunged in. It was wonderful.

When my friend’s mother found out about our adventure, I believe she may have blanched. She seemed astonished and horrified in equal measure. Did we have any idea what was in that river?

We didn’t. I knew that longtime Richmonders spoke of the river with a sort of hushed horror, as though it were a neighbor’s daughter fallen into ruination and sin. I’d always put that down to some kind of irrational, citified dread of the river’s untamed wilderness of rocks and currents. I didn’t know that the James we’d been swimming in was contaminated at that time by a witch’s brew of industrial toxins, pesticides, chemical fertilizers and raw sewage. I didn’t know that Kepone had recently made the river a national byword for environmental disaster.

Had we known all that, it might have given us pause. Or it might not. As we didn’t fall ill or grow any extra limbs, we didn’t stop going down to the river—and, in fact, our subsequent expeditions were fueled by the illicit thrill of adventures your parents don’t approve of.

Today I am a parent, and I still swim in the river, and so does my child. Today, though, the James is a far healthier river. That is not to say that it is entirely healthy, or that the gains that have been made in the past decades can’t be lost without careful stewardship in the future—increasing development is now the major threat to many of America’s waterways. However, the signs of a river’s renaissance are everywhere on the James. Thanks in large part to the federal Clean Water Act of 1972, there has been a steady and substantial reduction of what are known as “point-source” pollutants, such as sewage and contaminated industrial discharges, that once turned parts of the river into veritable dead zones. Bald eagles, which had vanished from the James by the mid-1970s, decimated by DDT and possibly Kepone as well, have made an inspiring comeback; in fact, east of Hopewell, the James River National Wildlife Refuge alone boasts a roosting population of some 230 eagles. Where 45 years ago the editors of the Richmond News Leader described a stinking cesspool below Richmond, where “no aquatic life of any sort survives,” today recreational fishing thrives.

The James River was in terrible shape 30 years ago, but cleanup efforts have largely restored its health. Today, rising numbers of people, and wild animals, are finding their way back to the 340-mile waterway - and attention is focused on how best to use and protect this hugely valuable resource.

by Caroline Kettlewell

7/12/10 12:14 PM

Latest Comments

Be the first to post...

Add your thoughts

  

Built with Metro Publisher™